“I believe in a persons right to privacy as well, but serving as a public official should be different.” – Dan Whitfield

Nick Murphy: “I believe in a person’s right to privacy, regardless of their job. If it starts with legiators it certainly won’t end there.”
· Reply ·
Dan Whitfield for Senate 2022: “Nick Murphy, I believe in a persons right to privacy as well, but serving as a public official should be different. They should be held to higher standards in my opinion.”

Ron H. – “YES, There is a BIG DIFFERENCE between an individual and a person acting under color of law. An individual does not owe a constitutional duty to another individual; whereas any person acting under color of law DOES OWE A LEGAL DUTY to uphold the U.S. Constitutional rights of any person they encounter or process in the scope of their employment as a person acting under color of law.

The law defines a “person acting under color of law” as any person who in the scope of their employment must follow either local, state, federal or agency rules, regulations, laws, guidelines as a requirement of their employment.

Under “color of law,” it is a federal crime for one or more persons using power given by a governmental agency (local, state or federal), to deprive or conspire willfully to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

That law is U.S.C. TITLE 18, SEC. 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law and carries a minimum penalty of one year in a federal penitentiary and up to life in prison depending upon the severity of the violation(s).

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority,

but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties.

Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials.

It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

This includes elected or unelected local, state or federal officials and includes police officers, nursing home administrators, etc.

Therefore, persons acting under color of law are judged under a higher legal standard than individual private citizens.

Many public officials in state and even federal government conduct themselves as if they were a private practice instead of a person acting under color of law who OWES A LEGAL DUTY to uphold a person’s constitutional rights.

Dan, we must get rid of qualified immunity for police officers and state officials.

The doctrine of qualified immunity protects state and local officials, including law enforcement officers, from individual liability unless the official violated a clearly established constitutional right. However, state and local officers can be sued in federal court pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. §1983 as long as Plaintiff presents a prior case similiarly situated where the Defendant clearly violated established law or Plaintiff’s U.S. Constitutional rights.

Arkansas Republican state legislators are a perfect example of persons acting under color of law intentionally drafting, lobbying and approving state laws which categorically violate the free exercise of Arkansans’ U.S. Constitutional rights.”

For example: Arkansas Republicans categorically violated LGBTQ Arkansans’ U.S. Constitutional right to medical services when the GOP passed Act 462: Allows denial of medical services based on ‘conscience’

Introduced by Sen. Kim Hammer, the law will allow a health care provider to deny medical services because of their moral or religious objections.

Objections to the law say it will give providers the ability to turn away LGBTQ patients. Arkansas legislators are not immune to federal law and their duty to uphold their constituents’ U.S. Const. rights, privileges and immunities, including LGBTQ’s U.S. Const. right to medical services, in the promulgation of state laws.

New set of Arkansas laws go into effect this week

A new set of Arkansas laws will go into effect on Wednesday. Some laws include a mask mandate ban, restrictive abortion laws, and limits for transgender students.

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — A bevy of new Arkansas laws are set to take effect on Wednesday after state legislators approved bills that include a ban on mask mandates, restrictive abortion laws, a Stand Your Ground law, and limiting how transgender students can participate in sports.

Many of the new laws that were passed and signed into law are facing legal challenges with two so far being blocked by judges.

Below you will find some of the bills signed into law:

Act 1002: Bans mask mandates in the state

The new law, introduced by Sen. Trent Garner, bans state and local officials from enacting a new mask mandate.

Only the Arkansas legislature is allowed to enact a new mask mandate. This law does not apply to a private business.

A group of parents are planning to sue the state over the law. Lawyer Tom Mars said the law violates the Arkansas Constitution.

Act 1030: Bans vaccine passports…

Also introduced by Garner, the state is not allowed to require people to show proof that someone has been vaccinated for COVID-19. This applies to local governments as well.

Act 250: Stand Your Ground

Governor Asa Hutchinson signed the controversial bill into law, which loosens the restrictions on someone using deadly force.

The law removes the duty to retreat before using deadly force in certain circumstances.

Opponents of the legislation say it would harm minority communities and cause an increase in gun violence.

Act 309: Arkansas Unborn Child Protection Act

Introduced by Sen. Jason Rapert, this law was blocked on July 20 by a federal judge.

Under the law, all abortions are banned in Arkansas except to save a mother’s life. It doesn’t allow exceptions for those who became pregnant due to rape or incest.

Act 498: Right to view ultrasounds before abortion

The law requires that an abortion provider perform an ultrasound before the procedure and to also explain what the ultrasound is showing.

Act 392: Allow cities to declare itself a “pro-life” city

A city can declare itself as “pro-life” and place signs along roadways as well as place a slogan on city-owned vehicles.

It can also erect monuments or a memorial to “lives lost to abortion.”

Act 626: Banning gender confirming treatments for transgender youth

The law, titled as the Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act, would have made Arkansas the first state to ban gender transition treatments for anyone under 18 years old.

But the law was blocked on July 21 by a federal judge. The law was originally vetoed by Gov. Hutchinson, who said the law went too far and wouldn’t exempt minors already receiving care.

The Department of Justice said the law violates the equal protection clause in the 14th Amendment.

Act 953 & 461: Banning transgender girls and women from competing in school sports

Two laws that were passed ban transgender girls and women from competing in school sports. This includes students in kindergarten all the way up to college.

Act 953 allows the attorney general to file lawsuits against a school that allows transgender students to compete in sports that are for girls or women.

Act 461 allows students to have a “private cause of action” against a school if they are “deprived of an athletic opportunity” due to a transgender student participating in a female sport.

Act 462: Allows denial of medical services based on ‘conscience’

Introduced by Sen. Kim Hammer, the law will allow a health care provider to deny medical services because of their moral or religious objections.

Objections to the law say it will give providers the ability to turn away LGBTQ patients.

Act 681: Alternative hate crimes bill

Gov. Hutchinson signed an alternative, scaled-backed version of a previous hate crimes bill.

Throughout the legislative session, the governor made it a point to pass a hate crimes bill as Arkansas was one of a few states without such law.

Act 681 requires someone to at least 80% of their criminal sentence if they chose their victim based on race, group, religion, characteristics or class.

Some say the law is not a hate crimes law and the term does not appear in the act.

Act 792: Require training for law enforcement officers who observe excessive force by another officer

The law will require all law enforcement officers in the state to complete a training annually about the officer’s duty to intervene if they see another officer using excessive force.

Act 249: Changes to provisional voting ballots

The law states that voters without identification will not be able to sign a sworn statement at the polling site so they can cast their ballot.

Act 973: Deadline changed for dropping off absentee ballots

The deadline for someone to drop off their absentee ballot in person has been moved up from two days to the Friday before the election. The deadline for mail-in ballots remains the same.

Act 158 & 703: Allowing alcoholic beverages to be delivered

Both of the new laws will allow breweries, restaurants, and liquor stores the ability to deliver alcoholic drinks to customers.

Act 703 also allows for a restaurant to sell a sealed to-go alcohol drink to customers.

Act 889: Allows lottery winners to remain anonymous

Any one who wins more than $500,000 in the lottery can remain anonymous for three years. If an elected official or someone related to the official are allowed to remain anonymous for six months.

For a full list of the laws passed in the 93rd General Assembly, click here.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *